The Great debate. - Comments

This journal is epic. God, I have such great little dares ;)

V It is nonetheless a fallacy, as it is based in assumption rather than logic. Also, if your evidence was real, then you would not be ashamed to disclose your means of acquiring it. Bah, humbug!

And now, I bid good day to you, sir!

This is just hypocrisy!
Have you not ever judged something by the name using your better judgement?
And how many times has it been exactly how you thought it would be?

The evidence I used was real, despite the fact that it was not in numbers! If you're that number fixated, then 100% of turnips are gross!

Ha! You say this is a disgrace to the institution of debate, but maybe you just aren't familiar with a proper debate. These are things we must think about before we open our mouths.

V Well, I never! Here is your case in point:

1) You conclude that the turnip must have an ill taste based on its name. What sheer fallacy!

2) You present anecdotal evidence in place of real statistics.

3) You never even qualify the subjects of your survey.

This is a disgrace to the very institution of debate!

How dare you!
I only take my information from the most reliable of sources. I do believe you are pointing fingers where they ought not be pointed.

This is blatant turnip bashing! D:

Good sir, please show some real evidence, or else keep your accusations to yourself!

Nice idea for a thread, though.

This is a very good debate, though I'm not quite sure if I've formed a solid opinion on it just yet.