January 27th, 2013 at 03:43am
@ discoveringclouds
I don't mean when the author burdens their own characters with double standards (although that is a fair point, and they really shouldn't do that I hate it when I see two different characters in one story whom are endowed with similar behavior yet are treated entirely differently because of the gender they were given by the author themselves), I mean when people who are reading it look at stories and go, "oh, well, he's so sweet and emotional" for the male character, but the moment a female character gets anything resembling sad or emotional it's "dear god please shut up and stop whining." Not all double standards are related to immorality and such in my opinion. It's about personality traits as well. You can have a story sans flirting and such where two characters with similar traits are held in different regards solely because of their sex. I could care less what the similar trait is, it's wrong to hate one for something you love the other one for because of their gender. I've had people tell me they hate a strong female character because she's too "selfish and thought too highly of herself" because she didn't take crap from her family who had a tendency to pit her against her cousins grade wise or accomplishment wise and defended herself against their snippy unwarranted comments. There was no love connection, there was nothing flirty or adulterous or just downright immoral going on in the story, they didn't like her because she dared stand up against her family who had ridiculous standards (and yes, families with stupidly high standards exist, one of my closest friends lived with that her entire life, nothing was ever good enough and there was constantly a "oh well did you hear what your relative did? Why couldn't you be more like them?") It's not always stretching the truth into immoral grounds or unbelievably ridiculous characters it happens with.
Even with no love interest or anything of the like in a story characters can still be discriminated against; it isn't all fueled by flirty story lines and such. I don't believe that all of the double-standards are fueled by racy stories or characters with promiscuous attitudes (although those do lend to some of the double-standards, but hey, if they can make it a good story I'm not going to bash their characters for having sexual tendencies, especially if that isn't all the story is about or that particular personality trait is something that is reasonable and well developed for a reason i.e. a promiscuous female whose actions stem from being informed as a late teen she is sterile and can have no children and therefore not only lacks the ability to get pregnant but also tries to use men as a way to fill that painful void in her life, she's not a good character but it makes sense because people cope with pain and actions like that in different ways and that is in all honesty how someone could handle it. Or the character of James Bond for another example. If a woman were to do the exact same thing he does there would be no end to it, that character wouldn't be accepted nearly as well as he would because as opposed to seductive her actions would be deemed "slutty" and she'd be a bitch rather than a smartass.) other types of material fuels the same unwarranted double-standards. Traits can be overdone and quickly sink into annoying or just bad writing of a character's personality. Way back at the beginning of the "Things You Hate In Stories" thread in the forums there were a plethora of posts that read like this or something similar: "I just really hate female characters because they're female, no real reason." It just shows that no matter what type of story you write or the content people are more likely to be discriminatory based on your character's sex. It really isn't all about what's necessarily "wrong" to us in my opinion. It's just that there are more nonexistent "Guidelines" for a female character to follow for her to be considered acceptable.
Double-standards against females happens all the time, no matter what you do. They can be "too independent" or "too dependent" because no matter what they do their actions are going to be judged more harshly than that of a males simply because society has set forth so many standards for women that make them "perfect" or "acceptable". Female characters do not get acceptance as easily as men no matter what the circumstances in real life or in movies and works of fiction. They are always under harsher scrutiny regardless of the rating or content of a story. It doesn't all stem from what is truly "acceptable" or "unacceptable", generally it begins with what society tells us we should hold as positive or negative. And there is so much more considered "flawed" with female characters in their eyes.
Ugh, sorry. I've had a long day at work and I'm more or less just exhausted.
It's just us knowledge lacking kids that haven't yet learned the great words and thoughts of scholars. Lol I really want to be a scholar.