@ kafka.
Empowerment? Through telling them that their selfish? Is telling someone with severe enough depression to pull themselves together empowering too? I'm sorry but that is a major logical fallacy.
I'm finding this highly frustrating. Do you mean - essentially - that anyone working in the field of mental health and themselves have had mental health problems (which is likely since around one in four genpop will have issues in their lifetime) are what? Self-oppressing? Am I self-oppressing in being reliant on mental health services when I get so bad that I'm standing on window ledges again?
Like you've said to dru: there are many organisations that look out for people's mental health but they also give advice about financial management or other things in their life which is either creating their issues or at least making them worse. They also have similar services and organisations for people with cancer or what have you. These organisations are there to give help to people who are not coping with X, Y and Z in their life. They are not forced upon the individual but are there if they need help. Essentially, it is similar to the Citizen's Advice Buereau but a bit more specialised.
Cognitive biases in people are present in all people and things like cognitive behavioural therapy attempt to change the ones that are feeding the darkness. Counselling allows someone to talk about the shit they've went through to someone that at least looks as if they care. These therapies are as useful tools to say a criminal who wants to change their ways outside of prison or someone who has just been through something horrific. Is this a problem?
Also, listen. I'm no fan of medication or psychiatric wards. Far from it: medication does little without other things going on and is too over-prescribed by GPs and psychiatric wards can do more harm than good. But there are certain levels of disorganized schizophrenia and the latter stages of things like dementia that requires someone to make sure they're okay. Whether that comes with a carer at home making sure they don't hurt themselves, having alarm systems put into their home that is connected with a warden somewhere nearby or (if extremely severe) a specialised home or whatever to look after them. There is a breaking point where an individual cannot look after themselves (I've seen it and jesus, it kills you) then what can you do? There is no amount of empowerment on this earth that can bring them back: many schizophrenia sufferers have collapses in brain structure, likewise those with dementia. What does your country do with cases like that? Genuine interest here: do they let them be?
Empowerment? Through telling them that their selfish? Is telling someone with severe enough depression to pull themselves together empowering too? I'm sorry but that is a major logical fallacy.
I'm finding this highly frustrating. Do you mean - essentially - that anyone working in the field of mental health and themselves have had mental health problems (which is likely since around one in four genpop will have issues in their lifetime) are what? Self-oppressing? Am I self-oppressing in being reliant on mental health services when I get so bad that I'm standing on window ledges again?
Like you've said to dru: there are many organisations that look out for people's mental health but they also give advice about financial management or other things in their life which is either creating their issues or at least making them worse. They also have similar services and organisations for people with cancer or what have you. These organisations are there to give help to people who are not coping with X, Y and Z in their life. They are not forced upon the individual but are there if they need help. Essentially, it is similar to the Citizen's Advice Buereau but a bit more specialised.
Cognitive biases in people are present in all people and things like cognitive behavioural therapy attempt to change the ones that are feeding the darkness. Counselling allows someone to talk about the shit they've went through to someone that at least looks as if they care. These therapies are as useful tools to say a criminal who wants to change their ways outside of prison or someone who has just been through something horrific. Is this a problem?
Also, listen. I'm no fan of medication or psychiatric wards. Far from it: medication does little without other things going on and is too over-prescribed by GPs and psychiatric wards can do more harm than good. But there are certain levels of disorganized schizophrenia and the latter stages of things like dementia that requires someone to make sure they're okay. Whether that comes with a carer at home making sure they don't hurt themselves, having alarm systems put into their home that is connected with a warden somewhere nearby or (if extremely severe) a specialised home or whatever to look after them. There is a breaking point where an individual cannot look after themselves (I've seen it and jesus, it kills you) then what can you do? There is no amount of empowerment on this earth that can bring them back: many schizophrenia sufferers have collapses in brain structure, likewise those with dementia. What does your country do with cases like that? Genuine interest here: do they let them be?
June 8th, 2012 at 01:16pm