- chibs telford:
- This is old but I thought I'd throw my two cents in anyway.
The circumstances regarding the actual marriage in question are not ours to judge.
It kind of is our job to judge though, especially in situations that can lead to abuse like child marriages. Society has to have laws to protect children from people who do not have their best interests at heart. It doesn't really have anything to do with being in love or genuine feelings- we can't legislate love, but we can say that minors marrying creates a dangerous situation and should be regulated (in this case, parental consent is required, in some cases even with parental consent marrying a minor would be outright forbidden). I think laws like that are important.
- chibs telford:
- I have a friend who got married at nineteen — a legal, consenting adult, with a brain and whose mother did not have to sign off on her marriage — and she divorced a year later. It had nothing to do with her age or maturity level; rather, the two simply weren't compatible.
I of course don't know your friend, but with more life experience (maturity), I think young divorcees probably would have realized they weren't compatible before marriage. I think in very short, young marriages, it has everything to do with your age and gilded views of marriage. And I don't think that's demeaning, it's not insulting to call it immature, it's just accurate. We expect 18/19 year old teenagers to be immature, they're entitled to be immature and grow as people.
And as someone who got married at 20, I know that probably sounds hypocritical, but I think it's something young people who decide to get married need to be aware of, I still think about it continually. You haven't experienced much of adult life, you're at a disadvantage, and your marriage is probably going to need more work and empathy to be successful than someone who gets married at 30. You can't go into it thinking love is all it takes and you'll be playing house.