- gonna hear dru roar.:
- @ Double Infinity.
The U.S. House has voted to shut the government down.
I get what you mean, but they didn't vote
for the shutdown, they voted for a spending bill that didn't pass the Senate that triggered the shutdown. It was a passive consequence, not a yay/nay vote for a shutdown.
- Double Infinity.:
- @ gonna hear dru roar.
thank you! Also, who has the authority to allow this to occur/relatively how easily can it happen, how is it prompted, and what is the intention of it?
No one has the authority per say to shutdown the government, it's a consequence of not passing a spending bill. The Constitution states that all spending bills have to originate in The House of Representatives. So, the House passed a largely agreeable spending bill, but they included an irrelevant clause that would have delayed the implementation of the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") for a year. The largely Democratic Senate of course refused to pass the bill with the clause about the Affordable Care Act. The previous spending bill expired on October 1st. Because no new law was passed, there isn't anything regulating nonessential government spending, so the government shuts down until a law is passed to authorize spending.
Shutdowns have happened before, the last occurred during Bill Clinton's presidency. As our Congress becomes more and more partisan, I think we'll see more things like this (ie, the sequester from previous months was a strong indicator this could happen).
The intention of it, unbiasedly, is that there is no intention. It's simply caused by the fact that there is no current law telling the Federal government how to spend money and granting permission. Realistically, the intention from the Republican House of Representatives is to use the government shutdown as a tool to force the Senate to pass a bill that delays Obamacare.