- Fentoozler:
- ...Wouldn't the contradictions be pros?
-Better control
-Age limits, which means, we'd probably see less underage prostitutes. We'd still see them but I bet there would be less.
-Less abuse from pimps
-More money for them instead of most of the cut going toward the pimp.
-Chance for less prostitution related crimes because it would be more professional
-Better control of AIDs/STDs/HIV. They'd probably be forced to take regular tests.
-Probably a lot less drugs involved.
-Safer for prostitutes.
-People would have better knowledge of what they're doing and what they're getting themselves into.
-It's..well..their bodies.
-Stripping, Posing half/full nude, soft/hardcore porn are all legal and are pretty much the same. They don't fake in most porn films - they are having sex. Why should it be legal to videotape and sell the tape of two people having sex and turning a profit, but not legal for two people to have sex and make a profit out of it - without a videotape.
Because pimps are such cooperative, law abiding citizens, I'm sure they'll comply with every law and regulation set!
At any rate, you don't
know any of that, you have no proof or evidence, you're doing a bunch of guesswork. And you're completely ignoring all the negative factors. Prostitution allows human trafficking to thrive. Any "career" that puts other human beings in the 21st century slave trade path does not have the right to be legal. I see that it's their body and they have every right to do what they wish with it, but your right to do what you want stops when what you're doing hurts other people.
Not to mention, what about the girls who are prostitutes because they feel they have no other options? No one should be put in a position where they have to have sex to survive, but it happens everyday. What are you saying to them? Making it legal makes the career acceptable, and there goes all of the aid trying to help them.