October 10th, 2012 at 07:10am
I like the whole dynamic between the 2 characters. It's very Holmes-Watson type relationship which is always entertaining. As for the writing itself, I think that some of the things you are saying don't really need to be said. In other words, try implying things and letting the reader sort of pick up on it on his or her own. Your indirect characterization is good, especially with Marcus, but one example is...oh I don't know what chapter, but towards the beginning (chapter 4-ish) Charlie says something along the lines of: "How did you know to put in Drug Stealer? The only way is if you new in advance that you were going to do that." Generally, people wouldn't actually say it. They might think it, but they wouldn't explain that to the other person. (By the way, that is an excellent way to provide insight into a character, having them do something like that. Good indirect characterization of Marcus, again) I also agree with spacejunkie; that is good advice.
That's all for now; I'll keep reading and hopefully muster up some more feed back! I really like this concept, though, keep up the good work!
Thanks for the feedback! The Holmes-Watson and House-Wilson combinations are my favorite.