The Lost Boys: The Thirst - Comments

  • silk tea.

    silk tea. (400)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    31
    Location:
    United States
    The article has been rewritten--the edited version just isn't posted yet.
    November 16th, 2010 at 05:06am
  • Phoenette

    Phoenette (105)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    28
    Location:
    United States
    The first Lost Boys movie was great. A classic. But you cant keep using that as an excuse to hate th new one, because the first of a series is always the best. I am also a fan of vampire and horror movies, and I plan on watching the new Lost Boys movie. This article didnt really achieve much to be perfectly honest (but not judgemental). I have a tendency to do the opposite of what people tell me. XD
    November 16th, 2010 at 12:59am
  • Time.For.Bullets.

    Time.For.Bullets. (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    United States
    Personally for myself, I loved the first movie.. but the second one was utterly repulsive it was so bad. Definitely a waste of money and time.
    November 15th, 2010 at 04:08pm
  • silk tea.

    silk tea. (400)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    31
    Location:
    United States
    Audrey, thanks. I had no idea this was posted yet, I'll definitely go through and edit more into it. First review I've ever wrote, I didn't expect it to be very great.
    November 15th, 2010 at 04:43am
  • Hannahdoll

    Hannahdoll (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    33
    Location:
    United States
    Ugh,
    yeah, when I heard about this I was like why?
    I love love love the first movie, but the second one was kind of eh...and I could tell how fake all the blood was and everything.
    November 15th, 2010 at 02:14am
  • Audrey T

    Audrey T (6730)

    :
    Admin
    Gender:
    Age:
    35
    Location:
    United States
    I've actually on ever seen (and loved) the first of the films. I saw, some time ago, a piece on this film and I thought the idea of it was...silly, to be honest. I mean, as adorable as Cory Feldman was, he was never a great (or even good) actor and he's only gotten worse as he's aged, so I can imagine how terrible this film was.

    As for your article, I thought it would have been much better if you wrote a small summary yourself (rather than using the one provided by IMDB). I think you could have possibly worked the movie's plot into your critique and that would have helped it move along smoother as well as give the readers a better idea of what you were talking about in your review. I thought your descriptions of things were extremely vague and the article generally lacked detail. So by the end of your review, I didn't feel like I knew anymore about the film than I did when I started reading. And it seemed like I, as a reader, was just supposed to take your word for it (that the film was bad) although you didn't really convince me of that.
    November 15th, 2010 at 02:01am