December 19th, 2008 at 03:11am
Store Refuses To Make 'Adolf' Cake - Comments
-
-
oh my god. i didn't think anybody would give their child that name. don't they know the controversery and such behind it? the poor kid he's going to have hell of a life growing up. nice article, it was well written.December 19th, 2008 at 02:36am
-
Everyone knows Walmart has no soul. They make a lot of questionable decisions and they have a lot of disagreeable store policies.
For one, they don't allow employees to work full-time, just so that they don't have to provide healthcare.
There was also the incident in NY on Black Friday where the man was trampled to death and the store closed for about an hour and then reopened and continued with the day like nothing happened.
It's really no surprise that Walmart would be the ones to make the cake for the family.
By the way, the family didn't name the kid "Adolf Hitler" as some cruel joke on the kid the way Wentz and Simpson named their kid "Bronx Mowgli." They named him that because Hitler is a man that they admire, which is about a million times worse.December 19th, 2008 at 02:29am -
I agree with discarnateXbeauty. It's just a name and we shouldn't be so mean or rasict about it. I mean, if I were to want a cake for my son with that kind of name then I don't care what they say, I would want it!December 19th, 2008 at 02:26am
-
Those kids are going to get curbstomped one day just because of their moronic names.
Honestly, what kind of loving parent names their son after one of history's most notorious dictators or their daughter "Aryan Nation" ? Those parents aren't giving their kids a chance. This is even worse than "Tula Does the Hula from Hawaii".
Or Gertrude.December 19th, 2008 at 01:48am -
I don't think the cake people should have denied the name, but the parents should have.December 19th, 2008 at 01:11am
-
Now, before it gets said or anything, I'm not a Nazi or whatever, and I don't praise Hitler, but I don't think that name should've been refused on a cake. I mean, so Hitler did some disgustingly horrible things while he was alive, but so did people like Charles Manson, and there are still people being named Charles and with the last name Manson. It's just a name. The swastika, yea, that was unnecessary, and they couldn't have expected that to go over well, but the name...come on now.December 19th, 2008 at 12:58am
-
Lmaooo
I dont think I would have either, btw the people under me are hilairious. I love there comments.
Who names there kid Adolf Hiter? Which is what were learning about in school,haha. I mean wow.
But if I made the cake, if I had to, I would just charge a "Little" extra for it. haha
Btw good article.December 19th, 2008 at 12:43am -
As sick as this is, I find it kind of funny the dad could be so blind. Poor kid's gonna be [i]raped[/i] when he gets to highschool.December 19th, 2008 at 12:41am
-
If his parents really named him because they thought the name was unique, then they are morons. I feel bad for the children.December 19th, 2008 at 12:38am
-
Wow. That's understandable, but yet, in a way, kinda mean, just because of his name. I think, personally, I would have put his name on it, not the swastica, but his name, I mean, you can't change that at all.
That and this goes with what we're talking about in school. XDDecember 19th, 2008 at 12:24am
The little "no one else would have the name" excuse might be somewhat believable if their daughter wasn't named "Ayran Nation". The swastika, too? I didn't hear that part.
Some people are morons.