I would, actually.
- lochnessmonster:
- We wouldn't go to a Frenchman and repeatedly call him Eurpoean and say your from Europe would we?
Scotland have their own government now, as do Ireland, I hate the term British because we are separate.
Then again, that's just me. I am principally European, and secondly British, and English at the same time as both.
Furthermore, I don't think devolution is a good enough reason in itself not to call Scottish people and Northern Irish people British. I mean, what about Welsh people? They have the Welsh Assembly, I think they might object to being left out. In addition to that, there is no English Parliament or Assembly, yet to say there is no such thing as an 'English' identity because of it wouldn't be true.
I think whether devolution exists or not, and to what degree it exists too (because, good as the Scottish Parliament is, it does not have the ability to fully govern Scotland) doesn't mean that you can't still have a national identity. Welsh people were still Welsh and Scottish people were still Scottish before 1997.
I do think that people abuse the term 'British' and just refer to English people. I also think people refer to 'England' when they should say Britain. A prime example of this would be The Oxford History of England, which is actually a history of the Britain as a whole. I can understand why people make the mistake, given that 80% of the population of Britain do live in England, but it's still an unfair generalisation.
Still, we think of Robert Burns as a Scottish poet and of William Shakespeare as an English author, so I think it works both ways. In Literature particularly, they're considered very separate things.
I have no objection to the term 'British', but at the same time, if people want to opt out, then I'm not particularly bothered. It's your national identity, so whatever, do with it what you please. It's a matter of choice and I respect that.
May 28th, 2009 at 07:36pm