- Jolly McJollyson:
- I just read the last chapter before the epilogue. The writing is stellar! There are a few grammatical slip-ups, but printing it out and reading it aloud will probably catch those. I'll be reading more of this soon, I can guarantee. I'm really very impressed with the quality and lyricism of your phrasing in several passages. Definitely above-average work. It's good to see you writing so well.
^ I like his because he's a great writer and he gives constructive criticism.
- Jolly McJollyson:
- I thought the epilogue was hit and miss at points, but when it hit, it hit fucking HARD. Wonderful use of holding off certain details until their power would be the most effective. Ok, one piece of advice I have to give you is never use a thesaurus without also looking up the word you choose. Some synonyms do not have exactly the same meaning as the original word, and even when they do, on occasion they simply don't fit the overall diction of the piece. "bromidic" and "ersatz" come to mind; even though they're both wonderful words, they don't seem to really work in the context of the story.
One other element I didn't really believe, though, was Bianca's daughter. Her use of the "I is" doesn't mesh with the grammar of her mother, and children first learn to speak by listening to their parents. I think her mother would "correct" her at the very least. Oh yeah, one example of getting a tiny bit over-descriptive:
"The path was empty and lonely and the rolling of the tires was incessant and vexatious."
I think you've packed a few too many adjectives in that sentence, and it's not just a matter of numbers. You have four adjectives in this sentence, but four isn't necessarily too many. In this case, what makes it too many is the pairing. "Empty and lonely" are similar enough for you to just choose one, and the same goes for "incessant and vexatious" (I'd pick incessant if I had to).
May 15th, 2007 at 02:32am