Burning Books/Banning Books

  • kafka.

    kafka. (150)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    32
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Bloodraine:
    A book itself cannot make you racist, or sexist, or bigoted, or atheist, or to hold any other viewpoint whatsoever.
    Can't propaganda make you racist?
    February 22nd, 2009 at 01:52pm
  • fool's paradise

    fool's paradise (1000)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    United States
    kafka.:
    Can't propaganda make you racist?
    What happened to free will? The only thing that makes you anything is yourself. Obviously propaganda is something that pushes an idea, and books can be very influential, but when it comes right down to it you're the one who makes the decision of what you do and do not believe. If you think something else makes you feel this way, then you must be an incredibly impressionable person.

    The beauty of free will is that we are not little puppets, we are wise, thinking human beings with our own opinions. A book can't send a little buzz to our brain that says, "Think this way!" It just gives you information about an opinion.

    About Huck Finn; according to Wikipedia:
    Twain wrote a novel that embodies the search for freedom. He wrote during the post-Civil War period when there was an intense white reaction against blacks. Twain took aim squarely against racial prejudice, increasing segregation, lynchings, and the generally accepted belief that blacks were sub-human. He "made it clear that Jim was good, deeply loving, human, and anxious for freedom.

    So, no. I don't think Mark Twain was trying to make anyone racist.
    March 1st, 2009 at 07:08pm
  • Matt Smith

    Matt Smith (900)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    32
    Location:
    Great Britain (UK)
    kafka.:
    Bloodraine:
    A book itself cannot make you racist, or sexist, or bigoted, or atheist, or to hold any other viewpoint whatsoever.
    Can't propaganda make you racist?
    Could it make me racist?
    I doubt that very much. I have a somewhat independent way of thinking. The BNP have been known to send their 'propaganda' around my neighbourhood and I don't think it affects me because it's basically lies. I can't be the only one who questions everything they read, surely?
    March 2nd, 2009 at 07:00pm
  • pierrot the clown.

    pierrot the clown. (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    Mexico
    I don't think books should be banned entirlely, just for some age groups. It really depends on a person's level of maturity; then again, how would people be able to know how mature you are? So I guess they'd have to ban things according to the reader's age.
    That's why I freaking love Mibba. :cute:
    March 13th, 2009 at 03:52am
  • folie a dru.

    folie a dru. (1270)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    37
    Location:
    United States
    Revolting.:
    I don't think books should be banned entirlely, just for some age groups. It really depends on a person's level of maturity; then again, how would people be able to know how mature you are? So I guess they'd have to ban things according to the reader's age.
    That's why I freaking love Mibba. :cute:
    That's not really banning though. Just regulating.
    Like rated 'R' movies. You have to be seventeen to get in, but the movie isn't banned. It's just rated and regulated.
    Like you have to be a certain age to buy erotica [sometimes].
    My fourteen-year-old friend buys sex manuals though.
    March 13th, 2009 at 06:23am
  • pierrot the clown.

    pierrot the clown. (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    Mexico
    druscilla; smiles.:
    Revolting.:
    I don't think books should be banned entirlely, just for some age groups. It really depends on a person's level of maturity; then again, how would people be able to know how mature you are? So I guess they'd have to ban things according to the reader's age.
    That's why I freaking love Mibba. :cute:
    That's not really banning though. Just regulating.
    Like rated 'R' movies. You have to be seventeen to get in, but the movie isn't banned. It's just rated and regulated.
    Like you have to be a certain age to buy erotica [sometimes].
    My fourteen-year-old friend buys sex manuals though.
    Oh, thanks for pointing that out. I get the difference. :think:
    March 14th, 2009 at 01:17am
  • emily.

    emily. (400)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    Australia
    March 18th, 2009 at 05:08am
  • Eden.

    Eden. (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    29
    Location:
    United States
    Burning books is terrible!! omgno:
    Just because someone somewhere says it's wrong or it goes against some sort of rule doesn't mean it should be banned or burned.
    I mean come on!
    For one thing they tried to ban 'Where's Waldo"
    Hello that was just a retarded move there - it's just pictures
    and how it offends some one - I have no clue why you'd get pissed at that.
    I guess haters banned books and burned them because they were afraid of change
    Well change is good and books no matter how many people ban them or try to have them burned will always be read.
    Whether it is out in the open or in hiding banned and burned books will always be read no matter how hard some haters try.
    April 8th, 2009 at 05:52am
  • fool's paradise

    fool's paradise (1000)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    United States
    emily.:
    However, individual books, I think, should not be able to turn our opinions that drastically. My outlook on life has been changed by many books, books have made me think differently and realise different things at times, but I think if you begin to hate on a race just because a book does, then you are - as fool's paradise said - a very impressionable person.
    That's what I meant, singular novel propaganda. Sorry if ity was misunderstood. In cases like Nazi Germany, well, yeah, there's no escaping that. But in the case of an individual novel, I find it silly that people believe it can influence one enough to change their entire opinion of something.
    April 8th, 2009 at 02:56pm
  • kllyqtpie15

    kllyqtpie15 (150)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    30
    Location:
    Isle of Man
    Burning and banning books is un-American. Whatever happened to the Amendments???
    April 24th, 2009 at 01:32am
  • Matt Smith

    Matt Smith (900)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    32
    Location:
    Great Britain (UK)
    kllyqtpie15:
    Burning and banning books is un-American. Whatever happened to the Amendments???
    The world, on the other hand, is not American. The American constitution isn't universally adhered to, even if the first amendment is a good thing.
    'American' isn't a synonym for good, or right, or just. Banning books and burning them is bad, it's an insult to liberty and freedom of speech, but these concepts aren't soley American ones.
    April 24th, 2009 at 07:41pm
  • tendo choi

    tendo choi (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    31
    Location:
    Great Britain (UK)
    I don't think books should be burned, whatever they contain. The author has the right to free speech. Even if they live in a dictatoral country, they should have the right.
    April 25th, 2009 at 12:22am
  • captknights

    captknights (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    27
    Location:
    United States
    More than half of the books I read are ''banned'' books. I mean, Harry Potter is ''banned'' in some places because it supports magic, didn't stop me from reading it.

    Some books are banned for the stupidest reasons. I mean, Alice in Wonderland was ''banned in the province of Hunan, China for the portrayal of anthropomorphized animals acting on the same level as humans.'' The Grapes of Wrath was banned in California because it 'made the residents of the region look bad'.

    Seriously.

    Don't like it, don't read it.

    EDIT: I'm sorry if I offended anyone, I was just stating my opinion. I feel very strongly about this subject.
    April 25th, 2009 at 07:25pm
  • folie a dru.

    folie a dru. (1270)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    37
    Location:
    United States
    "The Lorax" by Dr. Suess has been banned in certain palces because it makes the "foresting industry look bad".
    April 25th, 2009 at 07:33pm
  • captknights

    captknights (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    27
    Location:
    United States
    Spaztastic:
    I don't think any town in Illinois has banned books, but I'm not sure. I know for sure, thought, that no suburbs of Chicago have. I've found Go Ask Alice and A Clockwork Orange in the public library.
    I live 49 miles from Chicago, we're such a small town we haven't banned any books yet. Our public library even has a banned book week, and they display them all for everyone to check out.
    April 25th, 2009 at 07:38pm
  • folie a dru.

    folie a dru. (1270)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    37
    Location:
    United States
    The Lost Years.:
    I live 49 miles from Chicago, we're such a small town we haven't banned any books yet. Our public library even has a banned book week, and they display them all for everyone to check out.
    The town I grew up in was really small.
    1200 people.
    There were fifty-two people in my graduating class.
    We banned a book called "Annie's Baby".
    The town next to us was even smaller. They banned the "Harry Potter" series.
    April 25th, 2009 at 08:12pm
  • captknights

    captknights (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    27
    Location:
    United States
    druscilla's number 9:
    The Lost Years.:
    I live 49 miles from Chicago, we're such a small town we haven't banned any books yet. Our public library even has a banned book week, and they display them all for everyone to check out.
    The town I grew up in was really small.
    1200 people.
    There were fifty-two people in my graduating class.
    We banned a book called "Annie's Baby".
    The town next to us was even smaller. They banned the "Harry Potter" series.
    Wow. There's an elementary school a town away, my friends went there, they said that they wouldn't let anyone under 3rd grade check them out.
    April 25th, 2009 at 08:23pm
  • folie a dru.

    folie a dru. (1270)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    37
    Location:
    United States
    Small towns can be worse because diversity may not be accepted and therefore they can be extremely conservative. A lot of my town was extremely conservative and thought Harry Potter was evil.
    April 26th, 2009 at 06:15pm
  • captknights

    captknights (100)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    27
    Location:
    United States
    druscilla's over.:
    Small towns can be worse because diversity may not be accepted and therefore they can be extremely conservative. A lot of my town was extremely conservative and thought Harry Potter was evil.
    I never thought about it that way.
    April 28th, 2009 at 12:13am
  • angus young

    angus young (355)

    :
    Member
    Gender:
    Age:
    29
    Location:
    Norway
    druscilla's way.:
    Small towns can be worse because diversity may not be accepted and therefore they can be extremely conservative. A lot of my town was extremely conservative and thought Harry Potter was evil.
    I don't understand why some people view Harry Potter as evil :(
    April 29th, 2009 at 11:59pm