I still fail to see why people are getting on his case for mentioning it when if he didn't, he would be hauled over the coals for it anyway.
- lovecraft:
- Once again.
They can build a mosque.
They can build it there, if they really want to.
But building it to 'make amends' for 9/11 is tasteless, offensive, and pointless.
Secondly, it wasn't a ground zero mosque, it was a prayer room, in a building that happened to be the WTC.
Third, anyone else find it ironic that this is being tacitly approved by the city(Supported by politicians, not that the government has any say in the situation), but the rebuilding of a greek orthodox church that was destroyed on 9/11 wasn't? And the Port Authority IS responsible for the rebuilding of all those buildings. I suppose because it isn't controversial, it's unimportant.
From the article: "On Sunday, demonstrators for and against the mosque faced off across police barricades at ground zero." That kind of makes me feel sick inside. Way to be disrespectful.
He's in a catch-22 situation.
There's still churches and chapels in Northern Ireland, is there not?
- wastingpaper:
- i think some people don't understand where the anger in this proposal is coming from. it isn't anger at the fact there is to be a mosque built, but rather where it is going to be. it's all well and good that american's should respect muslims right to worship in a mosque since muslims also died during 9/11, but i think the muslim community should show american's more understanding and not propose the building of a mosque what like, 2 streets away from where muslim extremeists murdered thousands
i know this is all agreeing with you lovecraft haha
September 13th, 2010 at 01:59am